Subscribe For Free Updates!

We'll not spam mate! We promise.

Chủ Nhật, 5 tháng 10, 2014

Arguments That Jesus Survived Crucifixion

By Jocelyn Davidson


There are ancient texts that state that Jesus of Nazareth did not die at the age of thirty-three on a Roman cross. Various historians and theologians wrote that this prophet and healer lived to interact with his disciples and journey into India and other places. The argument that Jesus survived crucifixion still goes on in Christian, Buddhist, and Islamic societies, as well as among non-believers.

One of the most important historical documents is the Bible, which contains early Jewish scripture and what is known as the New Testament. Although this book is a record of both spiritual and secular history and might be assumed to be biased, much supporting evidence for its validity has been discovered by scholars and archaeologists. In fact, no other writings, ancient or modern, have so much evidence of authenticity.

Much of history is based on ancient texts that are not contemporary. The existence of Plato, for instance, is revealed in documents dating no closer to his life than 500 years. Christian beliefs, in contrast, are founded on writings that date to 100 AD. It is true that no personal writings of the twelve disciples have been recovered, but the Jewish method of copying sacred books kept the text consistent throughout antiquity.

For another, the 'eyewitness' accounts are remarkably similar. They are consistent enough to be acceptable as evidence in a secular court of law. The events of Jesus' life, as well as many of his deeds and sayings, were recorded by Matthew and John, who were with him during his three years of ministry in Israel, and by Luke and Mark, who were contemporaries of his followers and wrote after the crucifixion.

The plan of salvation, which ushers a Christian believer into eternal relationship with God, is founded on the crucifixion. It has been said that the Messiah was born to die. Paul writes of this in his epistles, saying that if Christ had not died and risen, Paul's preaching is in vain. Under Jewish (God's) law, only a blood sacrifice can atone for sin; Jesus's death on the cross paid for the sins of the whole world as the final atonement for all.

God does not reward earthly life that is not redeemed by the blood of his son. A 'good' life is not sufficient to atone for sin that separates man from God. Only those who accept that they are sinners, deserving to die, and that Jesus's death on the cross paid their penalty can become the children of God. The Lamb paid the price for all, and his resurrection made him the firstborn of all who have new life in Christ.

This man said he was the Son of God and that whoever had seen him had seen the Father. Hundreds of years of prophecy foretold the coming of such a one to restore the covenant God made with Abraham. Prophet after prophet revealed truths that could only have come from God. There are no prophecies about a ministry for the Son of God on other continents and shared with other teachers.

The sufferings of anyone nailed - not bound - to a cross are horrific, but mere suffering does not qualify anyone to be the propitiation for the sins of the whole world. It is the resurrection that brings this assurance and the hope of eternal life to anyone who believes, accepts, submits, and follows.




About the Author:



Please Give Us Your 1 Minute In Sharing This Post!
SOCIALIZE IT →
FOLLOW US →
SHARE IT →
Powered By: BloggerYard.Com

0 nhận xét:

Đăng nhận xét