In most parts where there are large water masses, most of the economies in these areas rely on fish for sustainability. The methods of cashing fish are different, some apply the traditional methods while others apply the modern techniques. The amount and size of fish to be caught also depends on the tackle one is using to catch the fish. Some states have enforced fishing gear Dryden Ontario Canada restrictions and the following benefits have resulted from the move.
The first benefit of these restrictions is that the fishermen who use traditional methods of fishing have been protected from those using sophisticated technology to catch fish. Most of the traditional fishermen use rods and nets that only catch the mature fish and are only capable of catching a small amount of fish. But if those using technology to fish can continue, the other fishermen will suffer.
The limitations are also meant to protect the endangered fish species. Most people who rely on this activity as a way of life know how to protect fish species and will use methods and fishing cogs that are friendly. However, in case the state fails to restrict the use of rods or nets that do not meet their standards, then, these species will become no more since they can no longer multiply.
Additionally, it helps sustain employment levels. When there are restrictions on how to fish, no party will have an advantage over the other in terms of what they make from fish. Those using technology and those using the traditional methods can both continue with their work hence no job loss.
Countries that allow people to overfish within a few years will have drained all their sources of fish. It means that the income they used to get from fish will be no more, hence reduced revenue. But those who restrict gear usage protect their fisheries such that as years go by, fish population increases and this leads to increased incomes hence the growth of the economy. Again, more job opportunities will be created.
In a market, the sellers with more products dictate market prices. The same will apply in the fisheries industry, those using technology to fish harvest large amounts of fish and when they get to the market, even when they sell at a low cost they will not incur losses. Those who suffer most are the small-scale fishermen because they make losses. But with the government intervention, a surplus will not be available hence the prices for fish will be competitive.
Also, gear restrictions help a lot to limit fish mortality. Most methods used to catch fish in some areas cause their death, especially the young ones. But with some methods being prohibited in some areas, the mortality rate significantly reduces hence increasing fish population. In the long run, there will be increased revenue from this activity.
In conclusion, once the population of these species has increased, the domestic price of the commodity is going to reduce significantly which is a benefit for the consumers. Again, there will be increased exports due to the surplus which earns the country foreign exchange.
The first benefit of these restrictions is that the fishermen who use traditional methods of fishing have been protected from those using sophisticated technology to catch fish. Most of the traditional fishermen use rods and nets that only catch the mature fish and are only capable of catching a small amount of fish. But if those using technology to fish can continue, the other fishermen will suffer.
The limitations are also meant to protect the endangered fish species. Most people who rely on this activity as a way of life know how to protect fish species and will use methods and fishing cogs that are friendly. However, in case the state fails to restrict the use of rods or nets that do not meet their standards, then, these species will become no more since they can no longer multiply.
Additionally, it helps sustain employment levels. When there are restrictions on how to fish, no party will have an advantage over the other in terms of what they make from fish. Those using technology and those using the traditional methods can both continue with their work hence no job loss.
Countries that allow people to overfish within a few years will have drained all their sources of fish. It means that the income they used to get from fish will be no more, hence reduced revenue. But those who restrict gear usage protect their fisheries such that as years go by, fish population increases and this leads to increased incomes hence the growth of the economy. Again, more job opportunities will be created.
In a market, the sellers with more products dictate market prices. The same will apply in the fisheries industry, those using technology to fish harvest large amounts of fish and when they get to the market, even when they sell at a low cost they will not incur losses. Those who suffer most are the small-scale fishermen because they make losses. But with the government intervention, a surplus will not be available hence the prices for fish will be competitive.
Also, gear restrictions help a lot to limit fish mortality. Most methods used to catch fish in some areas cause their death, especially the young ones. But with some methods being prohibited in some areas, the mortality rate significantly reduces hence increasing fish population. In the long run, there will be increased revenue from this activity.
In conclusion, once the population of these species has increased, the domestic price of the commodity is going to reduce significantly which is a benefit for the consumers. Again, there will be increased exports due to the surplus which earns the country foreign exchange.
About the Author:
If you are looking for information about fishing gear Dryden Ontario Canada residents can visit our web pages today. More details are available at http://www.kasportandtackle.ca now.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét